The following are the main pieces of legislation that apply to the use of computers.
These regulations relate to the Health and Safety of individuals using computers in a work context. Employers, employees and manufacturers all have certain responsibilities.
Employers must,
Employees must,
Manufacturers must,
This legislation applies to employees who use VDUs as a significant part of their work. Those who use VDUs only occasionally are not covered by this legislation.
Employers still have other health and safety responsibilities.
Like the EU, the Health & Safety Executive suffers from an image problem and a regular assault from the tabloid media and bad TV. In most cases, news stories centre around myths or the misinterpretation of legislation by organisations.
The term 'health and safety', like the term 'political correctness' is often swiftly followed by the words, '...gone mad!'. Take the trouble to find out the truth. The tabloid journalists know full well what the real truth is - they also know what sells stories. The misreporting is always deliberate.
For example, you may be interested to know that there is not and has never been a law against the throwing of snowballs. There are plenty of good reasons why a school might choose not to allow pupils to do so. The actual regulations cover basic responsibilities and prevent the needless endangerment of hard-working people simply to line someone else's pockets. They also make organisation's legally accountable for the accidents that result from their negligence.
Check out the myths at http://www.hse.gov.uk/myth/index.htm
Under this act it is illegal to,
This Act has been updated more recently by the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003 which includes a section on Electronic Rights Management.
A patent is an intellectual property right. Governments grant patents. Patents protect inventions in the country in which they are granted.
For an invention to be patentable it must be
Inventions relating to computer software may be patentable, but only if they involve something more than just software running on a computer in a technically ordinary way. There must be some form of innovative 'technical effect' for software to be patentable.
There are three levels of offence under this act:
This act contains clauses which effectively stand as amendments to the Computer Misuse Act. It provides clarification in some areas
Unauthorised Access To Computer Materials (Hacking)
Someone is guilty of the offence if:
Carrying Out Unauthorised Acts In Relation To A Computer
Someone is guilty of the offence if
The term certain result can be taken to mean,
Making, Supplying Or Obtaining Articles For Use In Computer Misuse Offences
Someone is guilty of the offence if
Summary penalty: up to 12 months in prison and / or a fine of up to the statutory maximum.
Indictment penalty: up to 2 years in person and / or a fine.
Summary penalty: up to 12 months in prison and / or a fine of up to the statutory maximum.
Indictment penalty: up to 10 years in person and / or a fine.
Summary penalty: up to 12 months in prison and / or a fine of up to the statutory maximum.
Indictment penalty: up to 2 years in person and / or a fine.
You can see from the table below that there are not many prosecutions under the act in any given year. These figures are for England & Wales in 2001 and are taken from Hansard.
Statute | Cautions | Prosecutions |
---|---|---|
Computer Misuse Act 1990, Sec. 1 Unauthorised access to computer material | 10 | 9 |
Computer Misuse Act 1990, Sec. 2 Unauthorised access with intent to commit or facilitate commission of further offences | 0 | 4 |
Computer Misuse Act 1990, Sec. 3 Unauthorised modification of computer material | 10 | 12 |
Total | 20 | 25 |
Under the RIP Act it is an offence to intercept a message sent via public or private telecommunication system, although there are exemptions. The Act regulates the power of government security services and law enforcement authorities by allowing the interception, surveillance and investigation of electronic data in specified situations such as when preventing and detecting crime. Powers include being able to demand the disclosure of data encryption keys.
The Data Protection Act gives individuals the right to know what information is held about them. It provides a framework to ensure that personal information is handled properly.
The 8 Principles Of Data Protection
Personal data covers both facts and opinions about the individual. It also includes information regarding the intentions of the data controller towards the individual, although in some limited circumstances exemptions will apply. With processing, the definition is far wider than in 1984. For example, it incorporates the concepts of 'obtaining', holding' and 'disclosing'.
Organisations Must
Registers with the Information Commissioner's Office (called notification) providing,
The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) is UK's independent authority set up to promote access to official information and to protect personal information. It covers
The ICO handles complaints regarding breaches as well as providing advice to data subjects and data users.
Organisations can charge up to a maximum of £10 to cover the cost of supplying the information on request. Credit agencies can only charge £2 for a request regarding financial standing. Health and education records require a charge of £1 - £50 depending on the number of pages of information requested. Repeat charges can be avoided by carefully listing the data required in the first letter to the organisation. The organisation must respond to requests within 40 days.
Extends rights to include access to any information (on computer or paper) held by a public authority. £10 fee can be levied although the organisation can refuse if the estimated cost of granting the request exceeds £450 for a local authority, £600 for central government.
Mark Thomas is an activist and comedian who manages to do both at the same time. His books, TV shows, videos and performances are well worth your time and money.
Mark Thomas made a request for information held about him by the government. He received copies of emails in which he was referred to as 'a complete prat' and a 'nutter' and asking if there was any 'background dirt' on him. You can read more in the BBC article,
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/1106142.stm